White Wrath

Für die dt. Leser: Dies ist die engl. Übersetzung eines Textes von mir, den ihr - so lange meine Urheberschaft genannt wird, gerne allen englischsprachigen Kollegen zur Veröffentlichung anbieten dürft. Auch die dt. Version könnt ihr gerne veröffentlichen, wenn sie euch gefällt.

For the english readers: You may copy this text and publish it wherever you like, as long as you name me as the author.

White Wrath

by Kairos

Originally published in German as “Weißer Zorn I + II” on “As der Schwerter”

Translation: Kairos (edited by Carolyn Yeager)

This is a text about white assertiveness and a new form of spirituality. The title is inspired by a quote of Fjordman. [he actually says „white anger“, which was translated into “Weißer Zorn.” German “Zorn” means anger or wrath. Anger is – in my eyes – something you feel, when she forgot to close the door again. Wrath is primordial, brutal, ancient. This is, what “Weißer Zorn” means. We are not a little pissed of, we feel a burning rage inside. This is “White Wrath”]

I will prepare myself for the things that will happen, must happen. I suggest you do the same. It is one thing to comment in blogs and to write more or less eloquent texts, to conclude and connect.

It is a different thing to be prepared. Prepared for battle, prepared for war.

Mentally and physically.

I believe that what I created here could, if it is properly regarded, crucially influence the global White Resistance against multiculturalism.

What is “White Nationalism”?

Although some in Europe (especially in Germany) regard the term “White Nationalism” as coinage, I want to use it to describe the true resistance that has been built up in Europe and in the USA against multiculturalism.

I define White Nationalism as “true” resistance because there is also “untrue” and “half-baked” resistance called counter-jihadism, the democratic (and pro-Jewish) right, conservatism and bourgeoisie.

For me, White Nationalism is the only true resistance because all other movements fully or partly misconceive the racial character of the conflicts.

We are confronted with the attempted extinction of the white race. Not just values or civilisation, but preservation of our race, and defence of our territory, are the gist of the matter.

Everyone who feels that this approach is ”too radical” or ”dogmatic” has, in my eyes, lost his will to survive.

White Nationalism is by no means a homogenous movement.

There are differences in different countries. In the USA White Nationalism is openly white because the presence of the blacks (and increasingly that of the Latinos and Asians) can be seen very clearly there, while the American whites have ancestors from the various European countries.

In Europe we often leave off the word “white”. When we are German Nationalists, it means two things:

First, there is a clear distinction to be made between people, even between European people. A German is no Frenchman and a Swede is not an Englishman. Whether we, as German Nationalists, are democratic, patriotic, national-socialistic or occult is irrelevant. Every show of distancing has to be seen as buckling before the leftist mainstream. Comrades are to be judged on their position re Germany and the White Race, never upon foreign-policy affairs (e.g. the Israeli question). Dissociating is losing.

Secondly, national pride, pride not only in our country but in our Volk (I use the German word for people or “folk”, see Kurtagic for a discussion of the meaning.) — is what patriotism is for Americans. It is as difficult for a German “constitutional patriotism” to be something positive, as it is difficult for an American “Idea Nation” patriotism that can be joined by blacks and Hindi to be positive.

Nationalism has a racial component and has to have it. That is something even the clean conservative, the right- wing bourgeoisie has to keep in mind or to be shown. If he neglects that, as our “conservatives” of the Leftist CDU [the German Christian party that under Chancellor Merkel left every inch of conservatism behind] or the American neo-cons, then he is not a part of the movement and therefore an enemy.

No “Joe Everyman” can be seen as friend or ally as long as he is held in the matrix of multicultural blabbering, holocaust industry and cultural marxism. He will see us as the “evildoers” and he will not answer to rational arguing. He has to make a step: To reinvent his belonging. Belonging not to a class or a social rank, or a “community of values,” but to a Volk and a race.

We are double-bound: To our Volk and our race, whereas the Volk is a subgroup of the race. The white race consists of the German Volk, the English Volk and the other white Völker (this is the German plural of “Volk”). One speaks of Europeans because the ancestors of the American, Australian and eslewhere- residing Whites are Europeans. The technical term for the White Race is Caucasoid.

Under the term White Nationalism I subsume every white nationalist movement, including all truly national movements in Europe itself, that are aware of being part of the white race. When I mean the American White Nationalists, I use the acronym AWN.

Some say that the European nation-nationalism (instead of race- nationalism), especially Germanism, which is of course sharply critical of the American and English crimes towards Germany, would not be productive: In this hour of hardship, and being outnumbered by the other races, all whites have to stick together.

Two points against that:

- No nationalist, especially no German, could take himself seriously, or could be taken seriously by others, if he was ashamed of his German heritage.

- Hitler made the mistake of thinking of Englishmen as reliable allies because they were white. They proved to be Jewish-controlled just like the Americans.

I don’t think an AWN or non-German nationalist lowers himself when he rejects total condemnation of National Socialism as pure evil and accepts the awkward role of the Allies in World War II and the Re- education of the Germans.

German Nationalism does not propose that Americans or Englishmen are inferior; it only declines to hold Germans as inferior.

Criticism of the Allies and NATO is directed toward individuals and institutions that act against the interests of white Americans and Englishmen. And, to say it clearly: This is no suicide!

When we talk about the American foreign policy that dictates, for example, France to become multiculturalized then it should be clear that this is no “American” policy or no policy made by the American people.

The German viewpoint is that there has to be a unity of all White Nationalists, even transatlantic, but under the condition that the identity of the Volk has prior-ranking to the identiy of race.

So why is a spiritual new beginning necessary?

Within White Nationalism there is the Christian front and the Heathen front. Both are certain that Spirituality is the key to a new White Consciousness. Both are right. But neither will succeed. There will be no neo-paganism to promote the movement and there will be no resurrection of the rotting corpse called Christianity.

Yet without a spiritual bond, or, to be more precise, in the present situation of spiritual discordance, White Nationalism is at least vulnerable, if not doomed to failure.

Paganism was a religion for barbarians, for warriors. These warriors went into the hall of fame if they died in battle; for all the others there was just the twilight of an Acheronic afterworld in which souls somehow managed to bum around. Christianity changed that and promised paradise to every faithful Christian.

This new faith was adjusted to military progress. While with the Heathen barbarians the best warrior won, Rome brought the art of war to a new level. They used well-engineered equipment such as ballistas, and even the infantryman did not fight alone any longer in a loose combination with other warriors, but formed an impervious, slowly advancing wall of shields.

Unfortunately, the new religion did not suit Rome—one of the reasons that the empire vanished.

Until the First World War, Christianity was the proper religion for men who fought in combat units against other armies and needed hope for a happy afterlife.

But (at the latest), Second World War atrocities blew this bond into nothingness. War was no longer a confrontation between soldiers where, of course, civilians suffered too, but was characterized by the destruction of innocents.

As I write this I think mainly about Dresden. The horrible bombings of German cities that were, in addition, strategically senseless, prove better than anything that the Allies did not wage war against Hitler, and even less to help the Jews. It was a war of destruction against Germany and the German Volk, a war of annihilation against the White Race. (Whites who fought for their race were destroyed by whites under foreign control. This does not mean that the American and English soldiers of this time were guilty. They were (as their children and grandchildren are until today) successfully persuaded of the fairytale that Germany was the root of all evil and of the necessity to defend their freedom against this evil. But on the management level–military and political–were seated individuals who betrayed their own race by purposeful design, and individuals who were not white at all!)

The Paradigm of the Cold War, with the threat of total extinction, made this status quo even more difficult. Individuals had to decide over the lives of billions.

Even today this paradigm continues to have an effect when terrorists try to take as many lives as possible, and one single, but well equipped U.S. soldier has to compensate for a hundred irregular fighters with turban and Kalashnikov.

The philosophy of enlightenment, the strongest of all Jewish weapons, has implemented an agenda of moral issues into us that grants every individual universal rights no matter who he is, which race he belongs to, or what he’s previously done. This agenda is not Christian, but, in our situation, suicidal.

For the White Race a conflict arises that cannot be won within the framework of pacifistic, universalistic and human-rights-sensitive interpretation. This conflict is, strategically speaking, a global conflict in which all non-white races fight against the white race—some more, others less; some openly, others hidden.

We need a spiritual matrix that makes us ready for a conflict against this outnumbering force; that makes survival, not moral considerations, top priority; that replaces feminine weeping with masculine pride.

There has been the accusation towards me that I would estimate religion, especially Christendom, only as to its usefulness to our movement. I would even interpret religion, especially Christendom, with intent to direct it in a way that correlated with these considerations of usefulness. In short: I would contrive a Christendom that would be compatible to White Nationalism.

But it is not for me to interpret 2000 year-old Christendom in a way that it suits my racial goals. And even to instrumentalise other religions for this goal is to be, at least, not truthful.

So I have to offer the following:

No matter to which god or which gods we may pray, the core of our spirituality should be our White Identity and our Nationalism.

We have to spiritualise these complexes viewed mostly as political.

This can be brought together with the thoughts about usefulness because a spiritual White Nationalism is stronger than a mere political one, and it is, on the other hand, not untruthful, because we did not have to reinterpret established religions, question dogmas, or wake sleeping gods.

Whether Christian, Heathen or sceptic, the spiritual framework I would like to introduce is accessible to every white person. It is not necessary to create a “new religion” in which one tries to integrate all positive aspects of Christendom and Paganism, while keeping out the negative. Our white brothers and sisters only have to reconcile these new formulated spiritual thoughts with their own personal beliefs.

So here I stand with nothing but the great mortifications of science beside me: The Darwinistic impertinence not to be the crown of creation, the Copernican mortification not to be the middle of the universe, and the Freudian doctrine not to be master in ones own house. We’re on a ball of dust within an infinite and absurd universe, struggling for trust and guidance.

Atheism and its side effects confronted not only me, personally, but the whole West with a string of problems that follow from absence of spirituality, separation, individualism and impiousness. We lost every bond while we allegedly liberated ourselves and are now so very free that nothing holds us back or holds us together. Instead of liberty we earned loneliness.

Even where we maintain we are religious, we are truly atheist because the old religions lost their credibility in our eyes. We came to a social, technological, philosophical level where spirituality seems unecessary.

When they ask me how to end atomisation of society I say: family and nation. Most people do not like this answer. We’ve adapted to being alone—very, very alone. We have to re-teach the vegetating isolationists in our society that loneliness is not the normal state of a human being.

With the ‘68 “liberation” we cut all bonds that made us part of a whole—we are no longer siblings, parents, children, not fellow countrymen or even citizens, but just egoistic individualists circling around ourselves.

We need a new transcendence that can only partly arise from belonging to a family and a Volk.

I was extremely anti-Christian in former days. I have discussed Christendom on many occasions and learned a few things:

1) The antichristian instinct, or most of it, is caused by a Marxist and Jewish denigration of this traditional faith.

2) Christendom nowadays is nothing like Christianity in medieval days

3) Current Christendom, as preached by the big churches, is not a religion that suits White Nationalists.

4) White Nationalism could coexist with a renovated Christianity, but not with the Leftist idea of Christendom as preached in today’s churches.

5) Incompatibilities between White Nationalism and Christianity are caused by the Oriental-Jewish parts of Christianity. He who is first a Christian could have problems accepting White Nationalism, but a White Nationalist can be Christian without a problem.

I myself did not convert back to Catholicism, regardless of the insight that hate of Christianity is mostly induced by foreign forces, and I do not believe that I will anytime soon. But there are aspects of the Christian religion that are fascinating, particularly one specific scene from the Bible:

I could recite endless pages of heavy-metal and Gothic lyrics that deal with this scene. From Wumpscut to Impaled Nazarene they all seem to know exactly how a crucifixion feels. With disgusting love of detail, just to carry blasphemy to the extreme, they describe how the excrement of the saviour flowed down his legs. Oh, perhaps they could just grow themselves beards and become living Mohammed cartoons!

For me, the reaction of Christendom to such blasphemies is characteristic: There is none. Of course, the priest living nearby is not amused if you confront him with such lyrics, but the experience in our society is that people are not only allowed to laugh at faith and Christian beliefs, but wilfully defile them.

They say you can only defile what you believe is holy, but this is not true. You can defile things other people believe to be holy. In this case the act is not psychological (I defile to free myself from what was formerly sacrosanct), but social (I defile to humiliate the other).

The reaction of the Moslems to the Mohammed cartoons, that scared the hell out of us, is a normal reaction of a faith community to the defilation of their set of beliefs. Of course there were lies and agitation involved, but I do not know a single Moslem who says, “Just draw him, I don’t care!” But many Christians think this same way about Jesus and this is why the blasphemies of the Satanists show a lack of humour. Who is it they want to provoke?

It is also interesting that the scene on the cross is picked up so strongly even by those who oppose Christendom directly. In this picture of total humiliation (crucifixion was a shameful punishment for deserters and slaves in Rome. The nakedness, exploitation, hours, sometimes days of torment... Romans knew how to not only scratch, but destroy human dignity) there has to be some hidden glory; somehow Jesus managed to triumph spiritually over his enemies.

The answer to this is not love of his enemies, nor that he walks into death forgiving his punishers. The answer has to be the blood- sacrifice.

We must travel from the darkness of servitude through bloody battles into the golden light of liberty.

This was the slogan of the first German Student League in the Nineteenth Century from which we have our national colours that we are allowed to show at sporting events. (In Germany, it is considered extreme Rightist to show the national flag. Only when our boys and girls play soccer in world competitions can—and must—everyone display the Black, Red, Gold). This is the allegory of the passion of the Christ and his resurrection; this is the interpretation of the analogy, if we want to understand the story of crucifixion. Iesus Nazareni Rex Iudaeorum, the mocking Roman words, is a promise of the suffering Christ to the downtrodden, the promise that from worldly humiliation spiritual victory will follow. And Christianity effectively infects Rome like a virus that is no longer extinguishable, and even grasps for power above the enemy under Constantine. He who laughs last laughs best. This is the kind of liberty we should write on our (black, red, golden) flag; this is the kind of liberty the sacrifice of Christ can teach us.

Templer (a Christian blogger) once wrote: The true Christian rates the freedom of man according to his fear of death.

Now I understand this sentence.

But as I said more than once before, I also appreciate neo-pagan musician Vikerness as an inspiration. I do not know if anyone reads the stuff on his homepage. I also have a big “to read” file.

Vikerness is honest enough to show paganism as pre-humanitarian. He not only rejects Christianity, but also its humanitarian inventions. Paganism and eugenic racism are the same to him. (Read part 5 of this series for another interpretation of the crucifiction of Jesus).

Infanticide was no problem for our Heathen ancestors—not only for the Scandinavian and German “barbarians”, but for the Spartans too.

Even Plato develops a totalitarian state in his utopia “Politeia” in which the people are systematically deceived about selection occuring that serves to intensify characteristics of the different social classes. To produce leaders, they let intelligent men sleep with clever women to produce sentinels, the strong ones, and so forth.

Since we were told again and again in school of the ”racial-delusion” of the Nazis, and through this indoctrination all thinking about heredity is taboo, it would require a politician from the SPD (German Social- Democratic Party, comparable to the Democrats) to say openly that free-mating, in combination with financial support of those who cannot survive on their own, must have a dysgenic effect.

(This is a longer remark for our friends in the USA who might not know this: The former SPD politician Thilo Sarrazin wrote a book intitled Deutschland schafft sich ab, roughly translated as Germany is Abolishing Itself in which he analyses problems with immigrants in Germany and discusses solutions to”integrate” them,such as all-day schools and harder punishment for major crimes. As I said on Revisionist Report with Carolyn Yeager those solutions are in my eyes the same as asking a housebreaker just to please eat with knife and fork. But Sarrazin makes two very good points in his book: First, he declares that people’s soverenity over their territories leads to peace—if there were only 40 million Germans left they nevertheless would have the right to the whole territory of Germany. What he does not say is that the present 80 million have the right to our eastern territories stolen by the Russians and Poles. Secondly, he says that intelligence is not only caused by social circumstances, but by nature. When, like in Germany, intellectual parents have none to few children, and the less intelligent of both Germans and immigrants who live from welfare have many children, the intelligence of the whole society decreases. For saying this, Sarrazin was called a racist and Nazi.)

If intelligence is inheritable and children are a source of welfare income for single mothers, but a cause of less income for academic women, then lower intelligence will spread.

Everyone should watch the movie Idiocracy that shows this dysgenic effect. America in the year 2500 is totally dumbed-down. The funniest part is at the beginning, where the cowardly thoughts (“at this time career is more important”) of an academic couple (IQ 138 and 142) are contrasted with the reproductive behavior (“I am pregnant again!” – “Okay!”) of the drunken fool (IQ 85). The academic ends up dying while trying to make a sperm donation, while his wife is hoping to get pregnant by in-vitro fertilization, The world of tomorrow could look like that if we do not go against it.

The taboo of racial thought ended in condemning as diabolical on religious grounds the use of technical tools for racial breeding. It is interesting that the liberals, leftists and greenies condemn these techniques, also, without having any Christian background.

I’m not of the opinion that the pre-selection of embryos is against human dignity. If I get a retarded child I will love it as if it were not. But won´t I wish that it were normal, both for myself and for the child too?

Only really disgustingly morally-myopic goody-goodies declare that to be “special” (the politically correct term for retarded) is a value, or the fight against deafness is genocide. (The deaf-dumbs feel threatenend in their “cultural identity” by new healing methods and hold the art of medicine as a tool of genocide.)

Helping to prevent illness is not against the dignity of the ill, but helps the non-yet-born to have a life in health and sovereignty.

If we can sort out negative genetic factors in the beginning, I see no ethical problem. There is, however, a problem with sorting them out later, after the child is born. This is nothing a civilized people should do.

If one says that we mesh with God’s plan through pre-implantation diagnostics, I say this is a very short view. If there is a God, he planned creation as sensible and efficient (the Catholics speak of the Creatio Continua, in which God is virtually watching over the evolutionary process). Thus Darwinist evolution, widely known to consist of the principles of natural selection and mutation, is divine.

Cultural development of man increasingly nullifies natural selection. There are three statements to make:

First: We need other characteristics to be culturally successful than primitive people to survive. A European would barely survive for long alone in the Amazon region and he normally do not have to if he studies the laws of the netherlands, knows the platonic philosophy well or made his thesis about the preromantic era (that were just three random fields of knowlegde that came spontanously to my mind regarding abilities that are not helpful to survive in a jungle.).

Second: Intellectual characteristics are increasingly more important than physical, as there is increasing degeneration of some physical functions. I myself am one of sixty-four percent of adults that need glasses, but even as a kid I was one of the fifteen percent of young glasses-wearers. I do not know any good work that could prove the stereotype of nerds wearing glasses, but this is beside the point. Bad eyesight that one can now compensate for with the cultural benefit of corrective eyewear would have been a selective downside in an earlier, natural environment.

Third: As discussed, supplying welfare to the weak in body and/or mind, justified by “human rights,” especially when it is organized in such a way that having many children is materially advantageous, will cause the sinking of the average IQ of a Volk.

I am not talking about an act of solidarity, of helping others over a short time period, as when someone becomes unemployed. We are talking about the consolidation of an underclass that lives off welfare and reproduces negative genetic factors, as well as minimizing the chances of their own offspring through negligence. Liberal programs (including Sarrazin’s suggestions) like all-day schools with free lunch just harden the dependency that is the real problem of the underclass. No one in Germany is really poor, materially poor, who gets the existential minimum due a person (which is more than an African medic or Indian lawyer can earn). Poverty in Germany and Europe is (still) relative poverty.

When one assumes that there is a divine plan, or just a reasonable natural principle behind evolution, then one has to see the unnatural nullification of it as a mistake. Then there are just two possibilities: The archaic way of selection or the way of genetic technology.

Another question about paganism is: Why do neo-heathens still think of the Christianisation of their ancestors as an affront after 2000 years? In Scandinavia this interpretation is widespread. This is no surprise when you look at the historical course of events: Christianisation in Scandinavia and Germany was not the same.

Personally, I take lots of heart from the song One Rode to Asa Bay by Bathory that was first published in the 1993 album Hammerheart.

One Rode To Asa Bay

One man rode the way through the woods

Down to Asa bay.

Where dragon ships had sailed to sea

More times than one could say.

To see with own eyes the wonder

People told of from man to man.

The God of all almightyness

Had arrived from a foreign land.

The rumours told of a man

Who had come from the other side the seas,

Carrying gold cross around neck in chain

And spoke in strange tongue of peace.

He had come with strange men in armour

Dressed in purple shirts and lace,

Smelling not of beer but flowers

And with no hair in face.

And the bold man carrying cross

Had told all one of Asa bay,

The God of all man woman child had come

To them all save.

And to thank Lord of Heaven

One should build to God a house

And to save one’s soul from Hell

One should be baptised and say vows.

A man of pride with the Hammer told new God

To build his house on own

And spoke loud of the Gods of their fathers

Not too long time gone.

The rumours said the man with a beard like fire

And the Hammer in chain

By men in armour silenced was and by

Their swords was slain.

Those who did not pay the one coin

Of four to man of new God,

Whipped was twenty and put in chains then locked

By their neck to the log.

And so all of Asa bay did build

A house of the cross.

Every hour of daylight they did sweat,

Limbs ached, because faith does cost.

And on the day two hundred

There it stood white to the sky

The house of the God of the cross

Big enough to take two dragon ships inside.

And all of Asa bay did watch

The wonder raise to the sky,

Now must the God of the cross be pleased

And satisfied.

Just outside the circle of the crowd

One old man did stand.

He looked across the waters

And blotted the sun out of his eyes with one hand.

And his old eyes could almost see

The dragon ships set sail

And his old ears could almost hear

Men of great numbers call out Oden’s hail.

And though he did know already

Though he turned face towards sky

And whispered silent words forgotten

Spoken only way up high.

Now this house of a foreign God does stand

Now must they leave us alone.

Still he heard from somewhere in the woods

Old crow of wisdom say:

“people of Asa land, it’s only just begun.”

See the original video of the song.

Recently I imagined while listening to the song changing the mental pictures invoked by the text to pictures of the Islamization of Europe.

Because this is the message not only of the song, but generally of these crazy folks that tell us their culture was extinguished by a foreign, oriental force named Christianity. I would not go as far as to say that we allow Islamization to happen because our ancestors were Christianised. But I see some parallels.

When the bells ring in “One Rode” I see the Muezzin, the final “just begun” invokes the pictures of 9/11 and the brutal scenes Geert Wilders collected in Fitna. It is not that I would believe the official story about 9/11 or would think of Wilders as the liberator of Europe. But his film shows the same as the song: An old, great culture is replaced by a younger, more unscrupulous one.

If we are Heathens, Christians or Sceptics, we must not allow this force of evil to infiltrate our continent and lure it to destruction! And we should be aware that Islam is only the visible enemy.

The invisible enemy, the power behind the curtain, these are those whose name one must not speak out loud. To identify them by name takes away from the seriousness with which an article is considered and smirches the reputation of people who reference the writer of the article.

We need well-considered, sophisticated analysis of this topic. Yes, it is necessary to speak the name out loud, but not here.

At this point there must be another proposition: If we fall for the victims’ narrative then we do it because we are good people.

We let them burden us with guilt for things that our grandparents did for a reason—or that never happened at all—because of our instinct to help the weak. That is why we let ourselves be called racists, suppressors of women, and warmongers.

If we were really the bad people the victims’ narrative tries to make us, then we would have gotten rid of the victims long before.

This is why I refuse to call this instinct to help the weak “human.” It is not human, it is European. There are horrible proofs for the mercilessness of other races, whether Arab, Turk, African, Chinese or other.

Our willingness to help others, to show mercy, to forgive, is used shamelessly by the victim-industry. This industry tries to give us a bad conscience so that we will continue to pay for everything and everyone.

That does not mean that our habit to help, to show mercy and to forgive is a bad thing, but we should begin to limit this habit to our own race.

That we will all die is for sure.

However, one has to suffer from advanced mental squalor to think about how to dispose of his own corpse in an environmentally-friendly and non-polluting way. But Greenies do nothing else all day.

The green ideology buys legitimacy not by saving the planet, but by being too late for that. The evil corporations and corrupt governments are too powerful, anyway—earth is doomed! But if we try to minimize farting and save lots of electricity we can slow down the thrilling “end,” but we’ll soon die of cell-phone radiation or the effects of global warming.

The green apocalyptic point of view is not the disease, but just a symptom! This hostility-to-life ideology that has even affected the churches, will not stop till the last one of us recognizes that the interests of the amoeba are at least as important as our own, if not more important.

The green religion is a direct attack on everything that made the Occident great: technical excellence, scientific method—even work, as long as it produces dirt, is diabolized. Not until the White Nations have become third world countries will the green fascists recognize that the hated, dirty capitalism brought wealth and health. But by then it will be too late.

This green atmosphere has to be fought. I began to stop dividing my trash (I am pretty sure that they just throw it back together!). The sentinels of Gaia do not, in the end, want us to use technical equipment carefully and to look out for our enviroment. They want us back in Stone Age! Their support of mass- immigration fits in with this concept.

Many religions exist by causing an atmosphere of ‘world-ending.’ The Witnesses of Jehovah had to delay the end of the world a couple of times, yet are not embarrassed by it. The Moslems also think of the gendered, decadent west as the Bringer of Allah’s Judgement Day, and even Jesus told of the coming end—but then there followed the Church.

Religions that preach the end cannot be our cause. We can only accept an end that leaves space for a new beginning. The great crisis will come and shall come. Till then we have to be prepared, have our weapons loaded. With the end it has just begun! We must never allow them to convince us of the destructiveness of technology, because we will lose the path to the divine if we let this happen.

When we assume that we will destroy the planet, no matter what, and that the human species is so stupid that it won’t last for another 200 years, then we can begin to build our own coffins—but please without tropical wood!

I am confident that the above said has prepared the reader for the new transcendency I will suggest.

It is about the solidarity of the White Völker, not only at a political and military level but at a spiritual one.

This solidarity is divine in the sense that only the White Race has access to the divine. This thought has ripened in me a long time; even now I hardly can articulate it.

It is not about illusions of a White Supremacy toward other races. The divine I talk about is, however, just for us. Other races have other gods or other access tunnels to the divine.

The divine, as I can grasp it, controls the natural way of things and technology can control nature through observation and imitation. So analysis is a prayer.

Now it becomes clear why I say that only Whites have access to the divine. That 99.9 percent of all inventions were made by White men surely cannot (not thoroughly) be put on the thousands of years this group ruled the world, but on the arrangement of intelligence. Whites have a greater variety of IQ than Asians, who have a higher average IQ. There are many Asian ‘high potentials’ but few masterminds.

This seems to be quite correct because the access to the divine of the Asian race is much more bound to group-feeling, subordinated under this group system. The Asians do not know Western individualism.

The black race seems to have a more intuitive, archaic access.

Amongst us, however, the individual counts—the competition of the (male) individuals, so it is no miracle that every now and then individual whites achieve great things, while Asians have more of a talent to copy these things. Black societies that organize in the Western model fail constantly.

If it were not already forbidden to speak freely about race, the anti-racialists would now say that I could not impute different abilities to race and they would present blacks like Shelby Steele or Hrsi Ali.

But the exception proves the rule. And I think it is very possible that people of other races can access the Divine by a "White" way, just as it is possible, but not very likely, that a European can assimilate into an anti-individualistic Asian society.

And I am pretty sure that we are not only talking about “cultural characteristics" here. The black who grows up in Hamburg instead of Somalia can perhaps deploy his potentials better, but he is not given new potentials by being there.

Back to the Divine. I think we serve it when we analyze and research, think, philosophise; in short, do what put the White Race into its supreme position.

This is why the atheistic good-doers want us to stop researching (there could be genetics in it!), to stop thinking (but rather to chase thought constructions), to stop philosophising (the traditional "bourgeois" philosophy has been almost completely abolished by postmodernism).

What does this mean for us? We do not have to make a division between religion and other cultural activities any longer. Whatever challenges our brain—making music, singing, reading, discussing, writing, working—brings us nearer to the Divine.

We see what counts. We have to re-animate analysis, put the rules of science back in charge, see that our children meet music, numbers and dead white men.

Lane’s forbidden Fourteen Words have to become a matter of course. I still do not understand how a positive proposition like "we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children" can discriminate against other races. The goal of the multiculturalists is the complete destruction of the White Race. Any attempt to stop this will be criminalized.

I have nothing against other races, but I think that it is not desirable to mix up and lose our own identity—our ethnic uniqueness that everyone except us has a right to. I am tired of watching the growing anti- White Racism, that I call “Caucasophobia” (a term Fjordman suggested, others say “anti- White” or “anti- Caucasianism” – sadly we not even have a term for it!).

The suppression of blacks in the colonial era was not barbaric (just compare how Muslims handle their slaves even today) but in post-colonial times they have tried to force White role-models of living onto black societies.

When each race tries to get nearer to the Divine (and why should other races have no interest in that?), we cut their own unique access to it through Westernisation.

No force, but also no help—that is the minimum of respect we owe the black man! We should not interfere at all and grant our permission for the blacks to stand on their own feet and to organize as they wish.

That is, of course, not a one-way deal! We have no obligation to take Africans or Arabs into our countries. On the contrary, we see everyday how the massive importation of these people makes it harder for us to serve the Divine, as problems are imported along with the people. Solving these problems costs our time and power.

We should renounce the multicultural society completely and choose membership in our communities according to racial aspects.

Africa is traditionally black, Europe has to stay white!

It seems very likely that there will be a segregation in the USA, dividing the racial-thinking whites from the other races and the multicultural-thinking "white niggers." The pre-condition to this is a systemic political and social downfall of the USA that has already begun.

The same can said of all European countries.

If you ask yourself, ‘but isn’t that racism?’, then I have to answer, ‘of course it is’.

But if for you to be seen as racist is a torment, then you are probably not interested in getting nearer to the Divine in the first place.

"Racists" do not despise other races. Multiculturalists despise all races. Talk to them! Ask them if, in their opinion, an Australian indio has the right of preservation of his “ethnic uniqueness" and why Whites do not. Ask them how they think to accomplish racial mixing and keep diversity at the same time.

It is about every Volk living on its own territory by its own rules. Our survival is endangered by the infiltration of foreign Völker into our territory. We have the right to fight back! We have the right to survive!

But what exactly is this "Divine" or "God"? How does one describe it?

I do not know if there is such a thing as God at all. I am not theologically qualified. I do know that I’ve never seen an angel or a ghost, that I’ve had to watch innocent people suffer and die regardless of their prayers, and I do know enough about neurology to assume a casual relationship between physical structures of the brain and consciousness.

But I know that I have a transcendental experience every time I do what I am supposed to do.

Since I became a father, I’m no longer tormented by the metaphysical questions of philosophical speculation. When one is changing diapers one does not care if the universe actually had a beginning or was there forever. This is more than "I now have no time for this stuff!" One begins to think in smaller scales—the next years, and the growth of the child in these years become more important, while the "Big Whole" that is supposed to be of such importance loses ground. Sarrazin (mentioned above) puts it this way: He asks himself why we should worry about climate change when our reproductive behaviour alone will cause our extinction as a Volk.

He who loves—I mean really loves—knows that one can become completely absorbed in another. This is transcendence too.

But when you do what you do best, you experience a glimpse of the Divine. Every musician who has experienced becoming one with his instrument, every painter whose brush once became independent (so to speak), knows what I mean.

In the act of creation we transcend, whether we are authors or carpenters. We become one with our work of art, with the world, with the Divine.

And others can re-experience this transcendence when they contemplate our opus. This is the answer to the "tormenting" question of aesthetics ("what is beautiful?"). He who does what he is made to do gets a glimpse of the Divine. Our imperative has to be to develop our abilities and potentials fully and create new things again and again. This way we serve God. Not with dishonest prayers and welfare to hungry children who, surviving by our money, produce more hungry children who grow up to wait on Lampedusa to be transported into one of our European countries where they can rob you and rape your wife and daughters.

We have to improve the technical inventions that benefit us. We must invent new things and optimize the things we already have. The better our technology, the nearer we will be to the Divine. Technical know-how increases our chance to survive as a unity, as Race.

If God is all-knowing, all-good and all-mighty, then we should quest for goodness, knowledge and might. We are, after all, His own likeness.

We must live our life before death as brave, good people. Then, so I believe, the afterworld cannot discourage us.

Not "dschehennan" should scare us, but the risk that soon it will be Hell on Earth for Whites.

Since I once forcefully rejected my ability to be spiritual, I am now spiritually like someone whose muscles are not strong enough after a long spell of not being able to run.

So I will try to list my thoughts on this matter systematically.

Every human being needs a method to bring his self into trance, to open his mind to the messages the Divine has for him. A condition for that is to have broken out of the matrix and the deprivation caused from daily brainwashing. Another is to become able to free your own mind.

I’m talking about a state of “being in the present” that the Zen masters romanticize. Many reach this state through meditation; others walk, run or sing.

How you get to this state is your own individual choice; what is important is that you do.

Then do nothing more but listen!

You may have asked yourself if you should “speak to God”, ask Him questions and wait if He will open a door for you. Relax! You do not have to make a step towards something, the door opens of itself in your heart if you let it be.

The spirituality, the "Divine" is not something that exists apart from us, but something that is a part of us. It is bound there genetically as an archaic tribal instinct that calls us to defend our own life and the lives of our families. We are not to let others fulfill this task.

This is the reason that Islam seems so strong; they still know this. We Europeans have forgotten it. To become free men again, we must get our ability to defend ourselves back. This is not about police and military, it is about every single one of us. A Volk in arms can never be defeated—at most extinguished. And even this is impossible without weapons of mass destruction. We have the right to have weapons and the right to use them against intruders of our territory. Instead of forbidding us the use of weapons as if we were children, we should be trained in them—in combination, of course, with the prohibition not to use them against our kinsmen.

Freedom of speech is based on the defiance of death of armed men.

Everyone can be forced to "agree" with their tormentor except a free man. And free he is only when he would rather die in battle than bow to the order of the tormentor.

While we are at this archaic topic we can deactivate our moral triggers and think about the fact that rape has always been a tactic in war.

The Faithful (Muslims) use this weapon with pleasure, they seem to be obsessed with the whole sexuality thing. That makes them numberless, but does it make them strong?

We should be careful to stay clean as a Race, because behaviour is not just acquired, but partly hereditary.

They try to convince us that we need not only cultural, but especially racial "enrichment." But this is what matters: An Arab or black can produce a brown child with a white woman, but this "Obama" or "Shelby Steele" or "Bushido" (a rap "artist" of german/ arab heritage) will feel black or Arab. A White man cannot produce a brown child with a black or Arab woman that will feel white. The attribute "white" is recessive. Therefore the Muslim, black (and in former days Indian) tactic of war is different from the tactic of Whites. Not that white men never rape but, as with all other cultural achievements, the condemnation of rape is, of all the world, most distinct in Western Europe – especially in comparison to Arabia and Africa. This can be led back to a genetic component and has a spiritual-intuitive foundation. This does not reduce its value as moral standard, though.

We gain by staying “clean" just the others gain something from mixing up.

This is the reason why the mass-rape of German women after the Second World War (not only done by the Red Army, but also by the Western Allies!) that was intentionally used to “educate” race-pride out of them, was a twice-deviant crime. Here our white brothers let themselves be turned into criminals.

We must not adopt tactics used by our enemies; we need other tactics. Better only a few genuine Whites than a mass of half brown slaves. Better a few who trade in the knowledge of their fathers than many who forget it. Better the few who know how to lead than many who just vote for the same traitors every time.

Fear is always bad. Caution is good if it can be the motor of action, but “Angst" paralyzes.

Fear is a bad counselor. Our "elites" flatter the Muslims out of fear; they submit in hope of receiving mercy from those who do not know this word.

And we? Are we obligated to show mercy? Or is mercy weakness? Does it not contradict justice? Every giving of mercy is per definition not just. If the delinquent had earned mercy, giving mercy would not be an act of mercy at all. Only the fact that it was unearned makes it mercy.

Mercy without an alternative is weak. Disgrace without an alternative is barbaric.

And God? If he liberates all (apokastasis pantheon) and no one goes to Hell, then the "tip" (Hegel) in the form of paradise becomes spiritual welfare.

Why should we have mercy for those who rape our wives, rob and betray our citizens, and would slaughter us like animals without batting an eyelash?

Mercy is just, and is only an act of strength if it signals and documents the supremacy of the giver of mercy. Who is not supreme cannot be merciful, but carries out an act of weakness.

Power is the key. Worldly and spiritual power do not contradict one another, but are mutually dependent. Caesar, Napoleon, Hitler—all were spiritual as well as worldly leaders. Caesar had the whole clergy of Rome beneath him as their high priest. Napoleon made the ideals of the French revolution transcendent and Hitler was not only a politician, but a religious saviour for the suffering Germans.

I am convinced that we will all play a critical role within the apocalyptic developments ahead of us. What exactly this role will be is in our own hands. It depends on the amount of virtue and courage that we are able to raise. I am convinced that life is not an accommodation with coincidence, but there is something called destiny. This destiny is, however, not something given from outside, but something within. I call it the "true will." How this “true will" becomes manifest in reality depends on the amount of power and (spiritual) influence one can have on the world. This variable is frustratingly small, but is better than accepting ones "fate"—namely, the will of others.

This is not about “magic" or superstition, it is about understanding that you are not alone. There is an immaterial bond to the other members of your own Volk, to the region you call homeland, to your own territory, and there is an access to the Divine.

The Divine, the inner voice, the intuition, tells us—if we can silence rational and routine thoughts as well as religious and political indoctrination—what to do. I am convinced that every European person who learns to listen to this inner voice will come to more or less the same conclusions.

Therefore my goal is not to spread the story of my own spiritual quest, but to create possibilities for European people to get in touch with their own spirituality.

Postludium: A statement of faith

At least the perception that every optimisation of your own abilities is a service to God, and the knowledge that there will be no Christendom or Europe if we do not start to defend our blood and soil, should remain.

Do you think this sounds like Hitler? Well, do some research about the percentage of foreigners in Vienna during Hitler’s youth. Even Hitler’s dislike of foreigners that was the foundation of his "fascistic ideology" and his "evil antisemitism" had its reasons.

Racial mixing disconnects us from the Divine!

I do not want us to hate each other. But no one should expect positive emotions from me towards people who spit on my culture and language, attack my kinsmen with knifes, rape the women of my Volk, and, on top of that, live from my money.

And towards the traitors who let those people into our country, one can expect even less of my patience.

Because my thinking had been so confused, I could for years only search furtively for the Divine. I will not give my new ability back!

The Divine is a part of me and I am a part of the Divine.

I believe that the spark of the Divine lies in the White Race. I believe that the perfection of my talents and the tapping of my full potential, creating work of art and challenging my brain moves me closer to the Divine.

I believe that love is eternal and the bond of matrimony is holy. I believe that children are the true and lasting meaning of life. I believe that egoism is weakness that destroys our culture.

I believe that I will die. I believe that there is a meaning above my individual life and this meaning is the secured existence and the purity of my tribe.

I believe that the Quest for good, wisdom and power will bring me closer to the Divine.

I believe that truth and liberty are the highest values.

I believe that I am not alone in the universe, but that I have brothers and sisters who feel the same as I do.